India’s Ram Mandir is not Hagia Sophia

Subhas Mitra: 6 Aug 2020

The Background:

Anti-forefather (Hindu) impetus in Muslims of the subcontinent got firmly established with the creation of Pakistan. Church on the other hand first makes a Hindu anti-forefather and then converts. There is hardly anything left to write about Ram Mandir(RM) but some  Muslim politicians deny the SCI verdict and insist on 450-year-old Mosque and another Congress vote bank extra-constitutional Judicial NGO called AIMPLB  says “they would take over  RM  from Hindus the way Hagia Sophia(HS) is taken from Christian by increasing Muslim population in India. Communists and Church authorities feel it is obligatory to support Muslims to keep India as “secular”.  I feel these need some discussion.

Some facts about Turkey and HS:

 (My references are from WIKI and Historian Peter R L Brown of Princeton University) 

1. This land where the Human settlement was established in 6500 BC  was  “Çatalhöyük “, which was inhibited by major civilizations – Hittites, Phrygians, Urartians, Lycians, Ionians, Lydians, Persians, Macedonians, Romans, Byzantines, Seljuks and Ottomans.

2. Constantinople, Istanbul….. are pre-Christian names. The era of the Byzantines began in 330 AD, when Constantine moved his capital to Byzantium (now Istanbul) during the “division of the Roman Empire”.

3. 312 AD – Constantine’s ‘conversion’ Rome fell to Christian in 10 years but Byzantines did not surrender though WIKI writes Byzantine Christian.

4. The word “Pagan” origins here in the 4th century by Christian Roman ruler(s) to all other belief systems of the place who did not become MILITIS CHRISTI (true Christian). Neo Flavian, the dynasty of Constantine, becomes aggressive Militis Chisti after the death of Julian I in 336 AD.

5. Sancta Sophia (‘Holy Wisdom’), officially the Hagia Sophia Grand Mosque (Turkish: Ayasofya-i Kebir Cami-i Şerifi)[2] and formerly the Church of Hagia Sophia,[3] is a “Late Antique place of worship”  in Istanbul. Built-in 537 AD as the patriarchal cathedral of the imperial capital of Constantinople, it was the largest Christian church of the eastern Roman Empire (the Byzantine Empire). {Read this paragraph again to understand it was a “Byzantine antic place of worship” but WIKI calls it a Church}.

6. The image: of “The Barberini” the deity (in ivory) of late Leonid/Justinian Byzantine. Ivory leaf from an imperial diptych, from an imperial workshop in Constantinople in the first half of the sixth century. {I do not know if the word “barbarian” originates from these people who gave a tough fight to Christians of Rome}. 

7. Helen of Troy was a Seljuk (not Christian or Byzantine) who became Ottomans. Ottomans were forced to become Muslims in 1453 by Mongols, who were Mughal in Hindustan.  By the 16th century, they were very advanced people of the region.

8. Turkey, a name given by the British on the name of a forest bird of Pennsylvania called Turkey. It was very much a part of Europe to which they are to join by 2023 as per the post-world war agreement. Some sections of Turks are in favour of secular liberal Europe, some want to revert to KHILAFAT. (I feel India’s congress supports their Ottaman khilafat faction). Thus India’s Khilafat supporters are dreaming of RM takeover by demography.

How Ram Mandir is different:

(Sorry the type of materials I was searching I could not get in WIKI)

1. 1178 to 1206 Muslims takes over Delhi from Hindus but Ayodha was a Hindu kingdom. The original temple was built in the early 11th century by Hindus and the same Hindus who still live as Hindus unlike the people of Çatalhöyük or Turkey.

2. HS has no original claimers. Both Abrahamic is claiming on “legality” of ownership rights on the occupied property. RM has its original claimants. ( forget religious sentiment or beliefs)  

3.   “Yama Zatdaw”  describes Rama dying by drowning himself as found in the Myanmar version of Rama’s life story, called Thiri Rama.

4. During Thiri Rama Hindus or Sanatanis did worship ‘objects’ beside ‘FIRE’ but worshipping Images of deities in Temple did not emerge ( I am not sure about the era of Temple making). 

5. From Md Bin Qasim onward Hindus were or run to find survival skills. In a linear chart of technical analysis “The Graph” was oscillating but heading down till severe most damage in 1947 and went on damage control without any bullish curve formation.

6.  From 2014 the chart stated looking up while no Abrahamic nation has such a scenario.

7. Abrahamic people who have destroyed 44 out of 45 civilizations (Ref: SM) might have revenge apprehension but Hindus spirituality never propagate “revenge” as does their Books.

 So cool down and live happily and try to become Indian. Those who think they will again destroy RM and built “ Babri or Nehru Mosque” ( for secularism) should remember no more remote control Hindu leaders are going to emerge to CASTRATE Hindus the way British created Congress did from its birth and made in England communists joined them in 1925. 

Never forget:

6 December 1992, is a date that many people are familiar with.

But few people know that prior to this day, there have been 77 attempts to regain control of Ram Janmabhoomi.

With:

4 attempts during the time of Babur,

10 during Humayun’s rule,

30 when Aurangzeb was on the throne,

5 when Shahadat Ali was the ruler,

3 during the time of Nasir-ud-din Haider,

2 during British rule and

once post-independence, during the tenure of Shri P V Narasimha Rao;

the struggle for Ram Janmabhoomi has been a long and arduous journey.