Intellectual Torture and Churchification    

Subhas Mitra  :     9 Nov 2019

Yesterday I saw with attention TWO videos. Number One – Savio Rodrigues’s observation on Post 370 Kashmir. He appears more reliable than even so-called right-wing Mainstream Media. He says Kashmir is and was an international Islamization project financed by many countries. The other side of it is – that not more than 15 to 20 % of local Muslims subscribe to such an idea but for fear, they do not dare to object.

The second video is of Rajiv Malhotra talking to his co-author in “Breaking India”. The co-author Aravindan Neelakandan said: “We wrote the book for all Indians for you and me because we do not want our children to end up in refugee camps.”  They were talking about this from the late 1980s and published the book in 2011 but they lament no action has been initiated by Govt. even today but BREAK INDIA GANG has become aggressive after 2014 as they think “They are caught with their pants down”. Pills of secularism are not going to work hereafter, no matter who rules.

These two interviews brought a spark to my thought. We know to some extent that   Ummah is a borderless entity that works for Islam and only Islam (not necessarily all Muslims or Islamic countries are 100% in sync with them). But “Church” is least understood by Hindus or even Christians of India. I think not more than 20% of Indian Christian can differentiate between Church and Christianity.

{Example: I was in Kochi decades back. One Sunday there was lots of pandemonium at our neighboring Church. We later came to know that some youth charged the Priest for lecturing politics. They said “we come here to pray to God not to do politics.} Can you imagine it today?

Background:

Sanskrit, Englishmen, and Churches:

During the 17th century European devout Christian priests arrived in India (notwithstanding the St. Thomas version- which Pope is said to have denied), the land that was sought after by Napoleon, the Capt. Cook, Vasco de Gama and you name it. They landed in Deccan learned language, primarily Tamil. Soon they came to know about the linguistic uniqueness, literature, historical strength of Sanskrit, and its influence in entire Asia. They switched over to Sanskrit leaving Tamil to evangelists for conversion. Some say they prevailed in forming Tamil grammar and interfered/fiddled with Thirukkural (the Tamil version of Manusmriti) to make it favorable for their purpose (Dravid –Aryan divide).

They were amazed to see India through Sanskrit. One Jesuits Father Hanxleden compiled the first Sanskrit grammar in the European language between 1699 & 1732. Those early priests soon realized if they keep praising India and its culture they would neglect their primary job of Christianization. Thus Father Coeurdoux in 1767 writes “Brahmins of India were descendants from one of the sons of Japhet”. खेल सुरु – distortion of Indianness starts. Bible says Earth has created 4000 years before God sent His son on the Earth. Therefore whatever they wrote about India in a historical context was dated in such a way that it does not hit 4000yr ‘faith’. ( Indologist Arthur Leoalin Bhasam doubts they learned the Indian system of chronology / Panchang reading but never admitted it.)

When East India Company’s administrators arrives and they found the richness of the land, its language, culture as well as the damage brought to it by Islamic aggression, they took interest in Sanskrit, learned it, and translated Bhagwat Gita, Upanishads, Hitopodesham, Geetgobindam, etc. and popularized in Europe. Sir William Jones (1746-94), Charles William (1749 – 1836) Horace Hayman Wilson (1789 – 1860) ware at the forefront.

Churches expressed unhappiness in upholding and popularizing Hinduism worldwide. But they could not prevail and the concept of Asiatic Society, Archeological Society, History research, etc. originated. Churches had to take a different route to suit their purposes. But Lord Macaulay’s deliberation in the British parliament in 1835 changed the situation.

The process of Christianization of Australia, Latin America, and North America was unlikely to work here as Muslims, by then, had failed to do what they did in the Middle East, Mesopotamia, Egypt, etc. (Could convert only 17% till 1857 and 24% by 1946 Lahore resolution for the creation of Pakistan) Thus British crown might have advised not to antagonize Muslims and turn Indians into brown Sahibs ( look like Indians but thinks like British) . (Not many Muslims swallowed the pill). Thus the works of all those western scholars started being redesigned to malign, denigrate and defame Hinduism. It is at this stage that Sanskrit was pushed backward, neglected, and treated with scorn. Brown sahibs took over from where they left.

Church Planting in India:

I discovered the word CHURCHIFICATION. Example: America, Australia, Africa (even South Korea) was FIRST Churchfield and then Christianized whereas in the case of the USSR it was already Christianized but re-Churchified after the falling of Mikhail Gorbachev.  There was a rumor those days that Church /Pope used to send Nuns in plain cloth to USSR with evangelical leaflets tied at their abdomen and declared them Pregnant.   To understand it in the Indian context we have to look at Goa. They wanted to Christianize Goa and Konkan region but Hindu resistance was so much that they had to adopt Churchification by Inquisition. 

Break India Force and Churcification :

Europe, the global Chrichification force, started searching INDIA for food and wealth and they discover America, East Indies, West Indies, and likewise. They did it with their courage, determination, and mental and strategic strength. It was the Church and their fear of material insecurity (poverty) that made them set out to loot India, unlike the Papal bulls in the case of America.  Because of Hindu’s callousness probably due to Islamic atrocities and subjugation, they could conquer India. India’s textbook even today does not tell that Globally Christianization is done by “Cannon and Bible” and not by Canon or sward alone. Bible is the source and reason for COLONIZATION. Islamization was done by Sword and The Quran followed behind. From India British, Portugal, Dutch left with their Army, Navy, Air force but did they take their 4th arm, the Church? 

Christianizing India:

Church came to India centuries before Christian countries/ rulers enslave us. They knew Tamur Lung, Babar to Aurangzeb’s Hindu Killing history. Church knew Churchification of India in the manner they did in America or Australia is impossible. (British knew how  Martand Verma was and how Dutch East India co was destroyed forever. why Muslims could not make more than 24 % Muslim till 1947 from 711 AD).

So Church adapted Hindu ways & means to kill Hindus from within. They manufactured AIT for racial and color of skin supremacy of Europeans and Dravid of African origin (say IIT Kharagpur IKS). The fact is the word DRAVID is a Tamil word meaning a place where THREE seas meat – used by Adi Shankaracharya. 

 The Muslim invaders used Persian and Arabic as an official language but Turkey was not comfortable thus in 1203 AD they resolved to create an Islamic Language for India and in 1837 Urdu came up with the borrowed script, grammar, and vocabulary. Whereas early churches in India might have found difficulties with Latin or Greek thus instead of Portuguese, Spanish, and French, they adopted Tamil before English became a common language in which those evangelists conversed in Tamil and Tamil people accepted them as their OWN.

After the British took over many of our Hindu rituals and procedures had been churchified. Even some Hindu Matt (মঠ मठ,), caste Gurus, Tamil literature have been churchified without Hindu’s notice.  I presume that is how English is their language but Hindi is foreign to Tamil.  The same happened in Bengal under the British. Church walked inside Hindu psych and Intelligentsia via Hindu / Bengali Renaissance. There is Hindu Matt मठ, Mission which is not Christianized but fully Churchcified. Some even worship Jesus; some have Papal administrative internal structure and pontificating). 

Ummah: 

Ummah could infiltrate in Hindu psych or not, Islam did. Removal of deities from Harmandhir Sahib (Golden Temple) was a ‘sharia act’ and the word ‘Sahib’ is an Islamic adaption. 

British started the Chruchification of Hindus by 1835 itself via English education. It was ratified even after the partition of India and the later formation of the ICSE board in 1986. ICSE CEO Gerry Arathoon said there will be no pass-fail tags. (The same procedure that made every convert learns the English language and gets a certificate for that too.)

Poverty, Politics, and Churchification:

It was fear of poverty that made Europeans explorers and it was poverty through which Churchification is expedited.  Shashi Tharoor says Muslims looted & destroyed India but the British not only looted but made us poor & illiterate systematically (so that Church could distribute food and Christianize). Remember those British-made Famines? (One in Tamil Nadu, Two in Bengal). 

This is where I too believe in White Supremacy. This world is ruled by মধা,मेधा, (intelligence) and not গাদা, गदा (piled up figure or digit). Who could bring all our enemies under one umbrella? Muslims globally are increasing demographically but Chruchification is taking place in common people’s intellect and minds worldwide.  They know they ‘fish’ well in turmoil water so make the water muddy by creating Naxalite, Maoist, and separatists to hamper the development and welfare of the poor and tribal so that rice bag conversion in that area becomes easy.  In recent years Church planting in TN & Kerala and Christianization in the Hindi belt have gone up many folds. Cyber-attacks on our scientific installations and security establishments have increased. Environmentalists and Human rights NOGs are flourishing with funds and the feed despite Govt control (think what it was under Sonia –John Dayal’s regime).

Foolishness of কট্টর . कट्टर Hindutvawadis:

They are blaming Govt. for not being able to check or control conversion or Jihadists in 6 years. These people refuse to understand the seriousness and implication because they do not want to know the deep root of the problem. India is not East Timor to declare herself a theocratic state.  We are neither a dictatorial China to solve it in the Chinese way. (Chinese communists are Patriots while our communists are Traitors). 

 
बौद्धिक अत्याचार (हिन्दू जगे तो विश्व जागेगा). 

However, I am an optimist. I am sure we will overcome all hurdles, if not in years but decades.