Subhas Mitra : 03 Jan 2020 / June 2022
It is needless to mention that Allan Octavian Hume, a British civil servant made a “club” for English-knowing Indians into ‘Indian National Congress, a political party with a native Convert as its President in 1855. Currently, it is headed by an Indian of Italian Catholic origin, who during the 2019 Citizenship Act, instigated Muslims for anarchy as a protest against on false interpretation of the Act. Now in 2022, we find Muslim anarchy started on some TV debate when she is summoned by corruption investigating authority for which her family is on bail from the court.
Is this a war of conception, perception, civilizational differences, or a tactic to draw political mileage? I am not sure but I think it’s a bit of everything.
India is amid a process of redefining “Indian nationalism and patriotism” that does not match the Abrahamic concept that prevailed in India between 711 AD and 1947. Indians never felt any administrative changes from British India until after 2014 except for the partition on a theory (2NationT) that the British created for the “Ireland” partition in 1896 and revived in 1907.
Within such a short period after 2014, 2NT and “Ghaz- a –Hind” ( a project to Islamize India) differences will evaporate, and ‘nationalism and patriotism’ will deviate from Abrahamic concepts, which were beyond the imagination of many politicians and academicians. Only Sri Aurobindo Ghose predicted it before his death on 5 Dec 1950 saying this partition will not sustain forever.
What is Nationalism?
1814-1914 French nationalism evolves out of territorial greed conflict with the British. Ghadar Party was formed in the USA to expel the British from India in1913. Then there was Hindu–the German Conspiracy, a series of plans between 1914 and 1917. Both were formed by Indian nationalists. So far so good – nationalism was GOOD (for French) or BAD (for British).
This was even though Theocracy (Biblical or Sharia) speaks of “STATE Rastra” राष्ट्र by believers or non-believers but the concept of “nation” or “race” remains obfuscated. Christian’s “fatherland” and Dar-Ul-Islam are almost the same for me. For them Nationalism equals ‘interest of OWN people’ (non-believers cannot be own people), Racism equals similar biological & physical appearance and Ethnicity is cultural identity and expression.
After the formation of The Nazi Party, and the NSDAP in the 1920 and 1940s, the concept of “Nationalism” changed in the Abrahamic world. George Soros declared “FUNDS” to fight Hindu nationalism against Modi, which could be due to fear of such nationalism emerging in India.
Even in the USA: Elijah Muhammad founded “The Nation of Islam” with Wallace Fard Muhammad in 1930. Muslims in the Indian sub-continent too came up with the concept of “Islamic nation” and that divided the NATION itself.
How wiki defines nationalism which may infuse Nationalism phobia:
1 Ethnic nationalism
2 Civic nationalism
3 Expansionist nationalism
4 Romantic nationalism
5 Cultural nationalism
6 Revolutionary nationalism
7 Post-colonial nationalism
8 Language nationalism
9 Liberation nationalism
10 Religious nationalism
11 Diaspora nationalism
What is Nationalism for a Hindu? :
“जननी जन्मभूमिश्च स्वर्गादपि गरीयसी“
(Mother and Mother Land are greater than Heaven). –The source is Ramayana.
Our Nationalism starts with Mother and Mother Land and not for a Nation (जाती / Jati) or Race(गोष्ठी also जाती/ group) or Ethnic group (वर्ण can also be जाती/ caste) or fellow religious people or anyone’s color of skin. Therefore “Motherland” and “Fatherland” is not the same philologically.
One of the great Indian nationalists, poet, playwright, and musician D. L. Ray wrote:
ধনধান্য পুষ্প ভরা আমাদের এই বসুন্ধরা……..
(Filled with riches, cereals, and flowers in our UNIVERSE)
আমার এই দেশেতে জন্ম যেন এই দেশেতে মরি।।
(I took birth here and wish to die in this place).
He addressed “Mother Land” as the “Universe” not just the border of India. Because Hindu nationalism origins in Basu/ Vasu i.e. Universe.
Hindus not only hold the वसुधैव कुटुम्बकम् “world is a family” but also सप्तद्वीप वसुमती “sapta-dvipa Vasumati” i.e. all seven continents and seas- Ref: Brahma Puran ( Ancient Indian treatise) ) meaning Hindus are citizen of the globe.
Megasthenes, (born c. 350 bc—died c. 290), ancient Greek historian and diplomat, author of an account of India, the Indica, in four books wrote India never thought of foreign invasion for 15000 years as she had such abundant wealth. British historians made it 1500 years. Thomas Babington Macaulay records in the British parliament in February 1835 that he traveled the length and breadth of India but never saw beggars, unemployed, destitute, or orphans. We all know how Brits left India in 1947.
It is quite natural for “Theocratic Units” of India destroyers to apprehend ravage if India regains “lost glory” but let it be known that Hindus are not taught to take revenge.
A True Hindu born in America, Europe, Malaysia, Indonesia, etc. may have a cultural affinity towards India but their loyalty towards their respective Motherland will remain unaltered. But when a Hindu converts he/she is ‘directed’ to shift Loyalty towards new religious people of the world.
Those for whom “Mother” is Father’s wife until divorced and we, for whom Mother is greater than Heaven, can never be the same.
This write-up is to tell those on German TV, who are expressing anguish about “nationalism” in India and those Muslims of the Indian subcontinents who were/are crying out of Hindu phobia by refusing to see the “reason” for dividing the country.
The day “A Celtic White man” or a European Byzantine becomes Christian he becomes decedent of the son of God from the desert of Bethlehem and Jerusalem. Every Sunday they are reminded in Church that -“it is Christ’s blood that flows in your vein”. Under such a situation when they destroyed civilizations and occupied them with immigration, the meaning of the word NATION changed forever. How a ‘Caucasian’ could claim America, Africa, and Australia as their nation? I do not understand.
Muslims are far more unambiguous. They do not believe in NATION or the boundary of a state just Dar-Ul- Islam and Dar-Ul-Harab. No further talk on it. The day a Hindu converts, he is supposed to behave the way the Prophet behaved with His family/people who, among them, did not accept Him as a messenger of God i.e. the Qurush tribes of Mecca.
Our nationalism was under attack since 711 AD and we did become weak in heart and belief.
Despite these, by 1857 AD we have seen our ex-Hindus (Indian Muslims) did develop Indian nationalism. British did take note of it and did everything to BREAK that nationalism. British did not rule the world by the might of Canon and Bible alone as did Columbus but by their superior IQ, intelligence, cleverness, cunningness, and administrative shrewdness.
No doubt Indians were one of the wisest people who lived on the earth but they did not encourage/propagate cunningness, deceit, and cheating or depriving others the way the Abrahamic did. Those qualities are integral to Bible / Deuteronomy and the Koran / 6- deceits (Al Taqiya). There is deceit in Mahabharata too but as a tactic to “speak the truth differently”.
Indian National Congress:
It is because of this I say – the Indian National Congress is abstract of Abrahamic principles of supremacy, expansionism (reducing Hindu demography by conversion), sustenance, and governance.
No Hindu ever wants to wipe out any religions from India or the world. The day Indians accept this, congress’s this ‘ism’ or that ‘ism’ is over forever.
Congress is ‘panicked’ seeing a fast reduction of “hatred” of Muslims and Christians towards the BJP. What BJP achieved on this front, in 8 years, they are attempting to destroy it within a couple of days by anarchy on communal clashes. A protest against Govt. policies ( Agnipath) cannot go destructing without sponsorship. No employment-seeking youth have such instant organizing capability.
Education System British left:
Congress MP, Shashi Tharoor wrote when the British came Hindu literacy was 88 %(The southern part had 100% and the British 17 %. When they left British was 100% India 27%.
Muslims entered 711 AD- their FIRST Madrasa was built in Bidar, Karnataka in 859 AD, next 975 AD by Mehmood Shah III, and then Warren Hastings made one in 1781 in Kolkata. ( in 1947- A total of 381 madrasas became 42,348 in 2015 Nehru’s secular India). I have read authors blaming Islam for the ill fate of Muslims in India who ruled with full partiality for 800 yrs but I find it a British ploy. Oxford, Cambridge, Doon, and Gwalior schools are all modeled on Gurukul and the British told Hindus Gurukul is rubbish / useless.
English Education System (EES):
EES is a “factory” where Indians were redesigned as Brown Sahib (white man’s burden theory). EES is an “industry” where their language is taught and obedient cut, copy, the paste workforce is manufactured, and by article 28, 29, & 30 in the constitution the Church is given for stable income for eternity. With declaring Sanskrit as a dead language their language has taken over entire printing, publishing, textbook, media, entertainment, research, and development work everything or even art & literature where all- India communication is needed. English has replaced Sanskrit’s commercial and mass communication activities.
Neither British nor Congress wanted Muslims to have modern education. Perhaps they wanted Muslims should live as hooligans so that Church & their fifth columnists can use them against Hindus while they keep taking the honey out of the flower called India. This Govt. is trying to become self-dependent thus honey could dry up.
After the partition congress furthered it by forming Universities to pick up the best brain and ensure they never love their nation or people. JNU, JU, etc. besides AMU, JMI was not enough they took humanity subjects in IITs so that there also such elements can be groomed. FTII & ICHR are high Madrassas made by congress.
Formation of congress:
I presume the Church of England engineered a permanent दरार crack in this sense of Indian nationalism by 2NT. They (British) formed Muslim League (1906) with mostly Ashraf (foreign origin) keeping a Native converts president. British did enough in G.o.I Act 1935, Caste schedule, and AIMPLB in 1936 and ensure Congress is full of people they trained to look like Indian but think like British.
Vande Mataram written in the 1870s, Congress was formed in 1885 Congress accepted it to siphon Hindu freedom fighters and supporters away from revolutionaries, evolved from time to time since 1857. Wise Hindu nationalists joined it along with Brown Sahib as they trusted in Gopal Krishna Gokhale (9 May 1866 – 19 February 1915), Sir Surendranath Banerjee (10 November 1848 – 6 August 1925), Sir Dadabhai Naoroji Dordi (4 September 1825 – 30 June 1917), Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan and Khans of Kalat, the descendent of Baloch Khan Leghar of Baluchistan who never wanted to divide India based on Religion.
British smelt it and imported a fully motivated/ trained ambulance attendant and placed him in the hand of a 2NT propagator M A Jinnah.
He was instrumental in dividing Indians into Hindu-Muslim. A Mecca-born Wahabi became an Indian nationalist? – I do not know how and why?
Congress discarded Indian nationalists like Bhagat Singh to Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose. Nehru becomes PM with one vote and Patel lost with 15 votes.
Right-wing Nationalists:
One MBBS from Calcutta who followed the path of revolt (अनुशीलन समित – Anushilon Samity ) resigned from congress and ‘politics’ to dedicate, in his word, Man-Making Process and formed RSS.
This RSS has been always their target to vilify, condemn and demean. Congress placed all vital places of the intellectual development of the nation in the hand of Made in England fifth columnists called communists.
How and why I fail to find nationalism in Congress:
First, ever British India election INC got 18 seats, M League-01 and the rest of 175 seats went to those who did not like to divide the country on the name of religion in Punjab. Sindh & Bengal voted for ML. Hindu Bengalis are secular-what a joke. Hindus wanted a united India but BS joined Muslims and divided India.
Three Muslim Kings (all in Pakistan now) refused to divide India.
Jinnah told Gandhi- “League will take care of all Muslims, you think of “your” Hindus. MK Gandhi told of what Modi Govt. did (CAA). Wounded Gandhi was not taken to Hospital, Nehru declared him dead, no postpartum done, and the body had THREE bullets of TWO types – Dr. Subramanium Swamy says. Who else killed Gandhi?
One Siddique (I forgot his full name) proposed Sanskrit as free India’s national Language BS like Nehru refuse during Bhubaneswar season.
The national flag’s colors were interpreted on a communal line by BS headed by Nehru. Now they are using green carpets in Rajasthan to replace red.
Vande Mataram, an Urdu magazine was published in Lahore but once Muslims got the hint from Nehru they started opposing it.
No Muslim or Christian distorted the original “constitution book” but congress Hindus did it.
Baluchistan and Nepal wanted to join the Indian union, but Nehru refused.
Satwant Singh and Beant Singh were not big Khalsa leaders. Who hired them to kill Indira Gandhi? Were Sir Richard Attenborough and his film put to the forensic test?
How come no congress leader dies with Rajiv Gandhi? His wife accompanied him to all such events except this one.
Why did Sonia G refuse a DNA test of Rahul G to identify Rajiv’s body parts?
Who paid for making Rajiv killer Nalini’s daughter an MBBS from London? Nalini was a day laborer.
How did Robert Vadra’s (son-in-law of Sonia G) father, and brother found died in suspicious and dubious circumstances?
Turkey supplied arms to Bokoharam to kill Christians but the day they supported Pakistan on Article 370, Congress opened its overseas office in Ankara.
They removed सत्यम शिवम् सुंदरम from the emblem of Door Darshan (nation TV logo), Lotus & rising sun from Kendria Vidyalay, and many more.
They named all most all free India’s enterprises in English like ISRO, Names of roads and institutions on Hindu killing invaders Muslims and Nehru khandan/Dynasty ONLY.
The list can go on but what are they fighting on street? If Afghan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh can have citizenship register (CAA), why Congress did not do it during 55 years of direct and 15 years of proxy rule. Was it delayed to import radical Muslims to fulfill Ghazwa-a-Hind’s dream?
Congress is not telling the agitators of TV debate that if and when the case goes to the Court of law, the agitators will be asked whether the relevant HADIDs are true or false. What will be the reply?
The entire pro-agitating political entities and Congress are in a fix since Nationalism and patriotism are resurfacing in their original form. Even converts are joining and they are getting panicked about maintaining Abrahamic Supremacy in India.
subhasmitra.co.in 
You must be logged in to post a comment.