Subhas Mitra 11 March 2021 (edited July 2022)
“Mind Your Language “a London Weekend Television serial, directed by Stuart Allen & made in 1977 and 1979. It was humor on British aristocracy and broad minded accommodative attitude towards global immigrants to whom Mr. Jeremy Brown (Barry Evans) taught English Language.
One day Mr. Brown asked students to say something about Television.
Each student attempted…. Suddenly one of them told TV is bad for leg.
Brown: Leg? How?
Student: It fell on my leg and I sustained fracture. (Laughter)
From here Imy writing starts.
If your leg is broken what different does it makes if a TV set fall or broke during football match or someone had beaten you blue?
Let me avoid discussion on politics but look at ground realities. What was Glasgow before immigrant from Middle East were welcomed? Compare with today’s. Media report suggests there are 80+ Sharia Zones where native Briton cannot go without change of religion. First Pakistan origin MP took oath and said: Inshallah, one day all MPs will be Muslims. (The hall laughed).
That is Indian’s colonizer’s country, they understand better. Now they are talking about moving illegal immigrants to Rwanda. I am bothered about where they left India after diving us on the basis of religion they declared India as democracy with religious bias in constitution that suppresses/ deprives 80% population to give extra mileage to 14% +2% along with a reservation policy.
In India Democracy without uniform laws and impartial judiciary is NOTHING but agenda of destroying HINDUISM from within. It is unfair to blame British for my predicament after 75 years of their leaving. Democracy for me is virtue. Historian told that in 6th century BCE India had 16 Janpad (republic) and ONE adopted democracy. Archeologists say FIRST election in the world was held near Madurai TN with pebbles and pitcher. Abraham Lincoln (1809 – 1865) gave the current form but many theocratic countries abhor it while in India the same very people love it because it suits agenda.
Why our politicians failed us in last 75 years?
I may not be competent to opine but I think our democracy is without a “check valve”. In ancient India to take part in election one had certain conditions to full fill to be qualified for election. Now there is nothing. Anyone with requisite amount of money can file nomination, promise heaven to ignorant voters, divide communities for electoral benefit, import illegal immigrants and issue voter ID, win election become rich and ruin the country. There is no dearth of VOTERS if they understand the party will ruin Hinduism.
There are volumes of books available that speak about the nation but let me point about West Bengal a state that was curbed out from “proposed East Pakistan” ( with 56% Muslims) as a ‘Hindu Home land’ in 1947 and remained with India. No sooner Hindu demography falls below threshold the state by default become Islamic Bangladesh. That might make many politicians super rich as we find in TWO of our neighboring countries.
How West Bengal’s caretakers broke WB’s legs:
British projected her as RATNAGARVA, a mother who gave birth to Progressive, Intelligent, liberal, secular Hindus who also learnt to revolt. After becoming “Hindu Homeland “in secular India her caretakers (politicians) failed to overcome the ‘colonial hangover’ and HINDUISM became “hate object” for them. Primarily for TWO reasons:
* Communism that targeted Bengal from 1930s. East Pakistan eliminated them the way British eliminated Mughal rulers and their progeny. Each Bong communists appear to be iconoclastic.
* Electoral benefit from displaced Hindus feeding them with Congress Govt. fund and induce atheism or hate towards Hinduism by all means including literature, cinema, Hindu festivities etc. Congress also joined. Take any Bangla movie of WB you would find insulting or ridiculing Hindu deities and ethos / values or glorifying atheism, poverty, inertia and amplify contentment.
They broke her legs (education & youth) so avoid her ‘march to eminence’ once again. Now they are concealing real causes and talking “The Television” (center state relation) broke her legs.
Post 2014 WB electoral mathematics has taken a new turn. Hindus of Hindu Home Land became eager to return but the “Hate Hindu Mission” (HHM) has developed other ramifications. There is rumor that one of the descendants of FIRST Congress president Catholic WC Banerjee is running an intellectual group to aid HHM from Harvard.
All HHM parties unofficially tied up for electoral benefit that appears like this:
At a rough estimation any party in WB can win with 43 / 44% vote. With provincial identity & Imam Salary, 96% Muslims under OBC reservation, guarantees 30 to 34% vote as these voters are not bothered about GDP, Employment, income tax or inflation. Thus any party with linguistic fancy needs only 10 to 14% vote from Hindus who are “Existentially Threatened Community” (ETC) not only in WB but in Kashmir, Kerala and four Christian majority provinces. Rs.500/- per month begging bowl allowance ( Lakshir Bhandar) will fetch that in WB.
How they made Jatugriha जतुगृह (wax house of Mahabharata) for Hindu Bongs:
1. Muslim Rules begins from 1203 AD
2. Surya Narayan Mishra from Vidarbha (Nagpur) became Murshid Quli Khan and the first Nawab of Bengal, serving from 1717 to 1727
3. In 1741 to 51 Bengal Hindu kings / Jaminders with 65.5% Hindus population allied with Nawab Alivardi Khan to prevent Raghuji Bhonsle freeing Bengal and form Invaders rule. Today with 31.07% (2011) Hindu population (in both Bengal), 70% Hindu (of WB) are doing the same. They are also blaming central Govt. for their ill consequences.
4. British (EIC) took around 150 years to select their site of action (Bengal) after arriving at SURAT, Gujarat and defeated Turkey ruler of Bengal.
5. Siraj ud-Daulah ruled from April 9, 1756 to June 23, 1757. He is described as Drunkard, looters of Hindu women….(may read -Mark Bence-Jones, Clive of India [London: Constable, 1974, p. 89) but Hindu literary figures immortalize him in Hindu psych as Hindu Savior and glorify him. No other Muslim rulers are as close to us as Siraj ud-Daulah , perhaps his name gives a sense of British superiority.
6. British preferred Hindus (Heathen) over Muslims (divine brother) as “Enemy’s enemy as friend”. Hindus breathed some fresh air after about 500 years of suffocation. They learnt English and started mimicking Englishman to go close to them.
7. At this stage Eastern India had 85% literacy and Britain had 27%. On a Hindu Bengali’s suggestion Sanskrit was banned and all those who did not know English became uneducated and later illiterate. (Ref: Brit parliament statement on Feb 1835 & Shashi Tharoor )
8. Asia’s first English University in Calcutta introduced Ramayana, Mahabharata and Upanishad as under and post-graduation courses but some Hindus became so much secular that they discontinued it.
9. Consequence to Nehru’s insertion of article 29 & 30 in constitution Hindu children are deprived of knowledge of their cultural tradition, heritage and history.
10. British started one Arabic Madrassa, 10 English Madrassa (Convent schools) and a Hindu school in Kolkata but Hindus changed the name of the school to Presidency.
11. On the name of Hindu Renascence Protestants brought Theosophical Society as Inculturation and British Theologists might have planned to “take away” Hindu intellectual and influential from Hindu mainstream society by forming Brahma Samaj (Biblical interpretation of Hindu philosophy). It worked wonder to make underprivileged Hindus become spineless, hapless and felt deserted.
12. Brit made Congress a platform for pro- Brit Hindus together. Under their influence some Hindu Bong wanted to form a separate Bengal with 56% Muslim.
13. Brit formed Muslim League to give teeth to anti-Hindu Muslims. Whenever Muslims killed Hindus in Calcutta or Noakhali these pro-Brit Hindus jumped to neutralize Hindu retaliation. These took Hindu’s testosterone out and made them “Henpecked”.
14. Historians believe to give Hindu Majority Syllhet to Pakistan Brit conspired with Muslim to demand division of the district between India (Assam) and Pakistan. Hindus in India was declared Pakistani at their ancestral Home while Muslims on Indian side was declared as Assamese.
15. Bengal historians of either side of border believe Islamization of Bengal was not so much through blood bath but through persuasion, intimidation, ignorance about Hinduism and Sufi deceptive technic ( Khanque etc).
16. I personally feel if intellectuals did not lick or kiss the boot (Jihadi) that kicked them out; Muslims of Bengal would have been like those of Malaysia, Indonesia. One thrown out Nobel laureate said Hindu mayhem and exodus from East Bengal has been a natural land reform for Bangladesh.
17. Almost every Hindu intellectual thinks Muslims can be befriended and brought out of their Sharia love through appeasement only.
18. London trained Communists in Bengal was introduced as atheist but they were/are nothing but Anti-Hindu. 18 August 1947 KHULNA district was given to Pakistan. Four Hindu communists hoisted Muslim League flags to celebrate at Khulna town. Next day TWO of them were killed by local Muslim and others ran away to India and started anti-Hindu activities (even till today).
19. Bangladesh did not allow public condolence meeting for Bin Laden but Hindu politicians of WB allowed.
These Hindus I am talking about are also known as BHADRALOK (Gentlemen). These Bhadroloks think themselves progressive, politically aware, and socially responsible people but most of them forgot that their future is in past. The politicians they have sponsored so far have failed them and brought them to a point of no return. The next step will take them to 1947.
Within 75 years the “idea of West Bengal” has evaporated from West Bengal.
If they identify themselves as only Bengali whose 72% are Muslims having 57 countries behind them in UNO why you are waiting for circumcision and FGM (Female Genital Mutilation).
Their atheist/ communist identity has lost sheen and is not working anymore. USSR is no more, China is a capitalist dictator, Cuba is neutralized and Venezuela is orphaned. From 1757 to 1947 when the British brought you up at a level, Jyoti Basu pushed you down from there in 30 years. You did not recognize it. 2011 you should have thought back to Bidhan Roy model revival instead you doing what you are doing. Which brand of intoxicant do you take? Your enemies started living at your next door and not beyond the border anymore.
I hold these Bhadraloks squarely responsible for Hindu Bengali’s present predicament. It is they who turned Kolkata as a Hub of Education, Scientific / Medical Research, Bioscope, Patriotism, Culture, Tradition, Heritage and Hindu Renascence and now they are behaving partner in destroying it and handing overs Universities to Political goons and literary Jihadist.
Please do not allow politicians to push the common Hindu Bongs to the level of Yazidi, Druze or Kurd.
HINDUS IN BANGLADESH
subhasmitra.co.in 
You must be logged in to post a comment.