Kashmir, Kerala and Bengal – case study
Subhas Mitra: 01 July 2023
The Red Triangle of ensuing devastation of Sanatan Dharma:
A Lal Trikon or Red Triangle is not merely a family planning symbol to indicate the area of “reproductive organs” but also the fire of aspiration, ever burning in the heart of a seeker. In Tantra, the downward triangle represents water (आपः), whereas the upward triangle represents fire ( अग्नि).
I am talking of a triangle to mean that if we fail to stop Kashmir’s further degradation of Kashmir, it may drip to Kerala and Bengal at its natural flow. As of now, the other TWO are walking the Kashmir way like Kalur Balad कलूर का बैल (Blindfolded bull of oil extractor).
Hindus (in 2011) of Kashmir came down to 2%, Bengal to 31.7% (both Bengal- in WB Muslims 37% (12% in 1947, without Rohingya counting) and Kerala 56%+ (mere head count).
If we analyze Kashmir, the other TWO will become clear. West Bengal’s position is, by and large, exposed. Before I go to Kashmir, let us see the holographic Kerala to look at the hollowness of Hindus.
Kerol of Parshurama :
Parshuraman is a synonym of Brahmagyan along with Khatriya Tej. Every Malayalee Hindu is proud of Adi Shankaracharya to ISRO scientist with a 56% demographic hold, but here are some hollowness revealed by Mathrubhumi Media and Indix Online video:
Hindus have no Hindu lawmakers in the assembly or Parliament ( all are secularists)
Hindus hold – 30% of total Land & 24% of Agriculture. 40% Agro with Christian, 23% Muslims.
3500 Pvt. Schools run by Abrahamic –Hindus run – 200
500 Professional colleges run by Abrahamic, 300 reserved for minorities – Hindus run -100
76% of teachers are Abrahamic
Education Ministers so far -95% Abrahamic
SC ST Hindus are not given a job in Abrahamic units ( except upon conversion-perhaps)
928 Hospital belongs to Abrahamic. Hindus run- 10.
In industry, Hindus- 28%, Muslims- 30%, Christians -35%
Suicide is 30% (above the national average), and 92% are Hindus.
An average educated, alert citizen of any part of India can recount 15 to 20 eminent Malayee Hindus in various fields. Alas, no Malaylee Hindus know how they became landless, penniless and almost non-relevant in the power corridor in their own home (state).
I doubt Malayalee Hindu youth know that Ram Narayan Nabuduri of Congress facilitated the Khilafat massacre of Hindus and named it Peasant Rebellion from the Mopla massacre and EMS Nambuduri of CPI laid the foundation stone of “ISIS Kerala” by creating a Muslim-only district the way West Bengal CM is doing now. Hindus are voting for these TWO parties continuously.
Let’s have a relook at Kashmir:
Who does not know that the Land of Kashyap Rishi and abode of Ma Sarada( Saraswati) is home of Rishi Patanjali (Yoga), Rishi Panini composed Ashtadhyayi (Sanskrit Grammar) here? Home to Sharangdev, considered the father of both Hindustani and Carnatic music. Acharya Abhinav Gupt and Kalhans of Rajtarangini.
The Kashmiri Pandits (also known as Kashmiri Brahmins) are Kashmiri Hindus and a part of the larger Saraswat Brahmin community. Saraswath moved north and south ( Nambudurai, Aiyer, Iyenger) after the disappearance of river Saraswati from the Varanasi region. They belong to the Pancha (five) Gauda Brahmana groups from the Kashmir Valley in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir.
By the end of the rule of Asoka (320 BC), ascetics from all over, including Buddhists, started coming to J&K for its serene geography and spiritual ambience.
Another count says that with Islam’s rise at Medina, some Jewish ascetics left Arab and took shelter at the Himalayan foothills. Kalhan, in his Rajatarangini (written in the 12th century), says. When the entire north and NW were under Muslim plundering, J&K was under the rule of the Surya Vanshi Rajput Lohara Dynasty (1003 to 1320AD).
Zulju, from Turkistan, wreaked devastation in 1320 when he commanded a force that conquered many regions of the Kashmir Valley. Sultan Sikandar Butshikan (1389–1413), the seventh Muslim ruler in Kashmir, destroyed many non-Muslim religious symbols/ temples and forced the population to convert or flee (as Congress allowed it to continue till 1990s).
What our forefathers did as rulers and as citizens?
As ruler and warrior:
1. What made Chach of Aror
(c. 631-671 AD), the Brahmin king ( forefather of Raja Dahir) engage in the Karbala war? What was the need to give refuge to Prophet Mohamed’s descendants? Around 300 years, they fought against Muslim invaders but did not take note of the behaviours of those Muslims to whom they gave refuge. Why did he not take note of The Medina Charter (the prophet’s treaty with Jews of Media)? Was he waiting for defeat and death? Was he trying to win over the Evil through a sermon and not fighting an Atatayee (enemy)?
2. Were Maharaja Jaipal and Hari Singh Nalwa trying to win Good over Evil by persuasion or showing magnanimity like the Hindus of present-day Kashmir, Bengal and Kerala?
3. Vijaynagar Dynasty:
Rama Raya developed a KHUJLI (of broad-mindedness) to put a nose into Golconda & Ahmednagar sultan’s internal quarrel by allying. That sank the mighty ship of the empire.
4. Ahom Kings fell into the trap of East India Co, who later designed the destruction of Ahom with Church (Nehru) and Ummah, and it is going on full swing.
5. Rinchin, a Mahayana Buddhist from Ladakh, took over Kashmir in & around the 1320s. As his subjects were all Hindus, he wanted to become a Hindu, but Pundits refused, so he became a Muslim and took the name Malik Sadruddin.
As citizen: How Kashmiris axed their own feet:
First Gharwapasi :
Butshikan’s decedent Zain-ul-Abidin (1423–74), was tolerant of Hindus to the extent of sanctioning a return to Hinduism. He operated a meritocracy, and Brahmins and Buddhists were his closest advisors.
Akbar conquered Kashmir in 1587 AD. During his Mughal rule, the Hindus enjoyed the security of persons and property and were allotted high government posts. Homecoming of converts was not prohibited.
But what happened during this era?
Those who did not migrate were known as MALMASI Pundits, Those who fled & returned became BANMASI Pandits, and those who disguised by taking up business were BUHIRS Pundits.
2nd Gharwapasi :
Maharaja Ranjit Singh defeated the then Afgan rulers of J&K and annexed his capital at Lahore in 1819 AD. After his 27-year rule, Dogra Rajput Golab Singh, the onetime close to Ranjit Singh, became ruler of J&K and moved and formed the Dogra dynasty at J&K, forming Srinagar, its capital.
Most Muslims of the Land were local converts under Sufi influence who were not haters of their forefathers (Hindu- Buddhist). A gazette of the First census of British India in 1881 writes a footnote that most Muslim converts of Peshawar, Multan, Punjab, and Kashmir area did not agree to be identified as Muslim but as Swadhari. British marked them as Muslims on their own.
There was a mass movement among native Muslims for “homecoming”, to which these Pundits objected. When Maharaja Golab Singh overruled the objection, Pundits jumped into the river to commit suicide. The attempt was foiled by none other than PUNDITs; not only that, they distanced themselves from other Hindus of the kingdom.
Interesting Note:
Why does Bengali Bhadoloks appear to be self-destructing as some Pundits?
D.L.Sheth, the former director of the Center for the Study of Developing Societies in India(CSDS), lists Indian communities that constituted the middle class and were traditionally “urban and professional” (following professions like doctors, lawyers, teachers, engineers, etc.) immediately after Independence in 1947. This list included the Kashmiri Pandits, the Nagar Brahmins from Gujarat; the South Indian Brahmins; the Punjabi Khatris and Kayasthas from northern India; Chitpawans and CKPs (Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhus) from Maharashtra; the Probasi and the Bhadralok Bengalis; the Parsis and the upper crusts of Muslim and Christian communities. According to P.K. Verma, “Education was a common thread that bound together these pan-Indian elites”, and almost all the members of these communities could read and write English and were educated beyond school.
Did Tantra have any role?
Tantra is also called KAULA or KULAMARGA. In Kashmir- shivaites; Kerala –Srivdya and Bengal, it is Shakti. Could this family-centric practice in 3 states dilute the importance of collective social responsibility?
When will we learn?
Can “Brahma Gyan” sustain without “Kshatra Tej”?
The movie “Kashmir Files” disturbed me. I tried to understand how the part of “Panchal Desa” OF Mahabharata became J&K (greater Rajoury & Gilgit-Baltistan) where Gyanis / scholars or Pundits landed in a refugee camp in their own country when (imposter) KP dynasty (of Gyassuddin/ Mubarak Ali origin) ruled Delhi.
At one stage, I was thinking of blaming
Mountbatten,
Maharaja Hari Singh
and
Jawahar Lal Nehru, for the entire development
Some Pundits objected to the abrogation of Article 370. Another former KP Judge propagates beef eating but never mentions pork.
Then I thought:
a. Could such a situation develop Without Overt or Covert consent/approval of the so-called KP dynasty in Delhi? VP Singh & Mufti Mohammad Sayeed seems coincidental (when a fruit is ripe enough, it must fall. On whose head it fell is a different issue). What were all Home Ministers doing from 1947 to Sardar Buta Singh during Rajiv Gandhi? Having Sheikh Abdullah hidden behind a curtain who “told a lie” about Kashmir to SP Mukherjee and why?
b. JKLF was founded in the UK in 1976. Who legalized it in India and why?
c. If M. O. Mathai, as Chief Secretary, could discover the Nehru dynasty, what would PN Haksar or other Pandit bureaucrats do?
d. Pandit Rameswarnath Kao formed RAW in 1968 with धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः as its motto. What the hell was it doing if they could not protect/perform their obligation (कर्तब्य)?
e. What was iron lady Pandita Begum doing with RAW? Spying Sanjay Gandhi?
However, I then remembered the following activities of KPs:
When the kingdom fell into the hands of Afghan forces, the royal family entered into matrimonial relations, took up the title “JARAL” to “MIRZA”, and became Muslim. These Muslim soldiers were placed in the Gilgit Baltistan region by the British. After the partition, they gave up to Pakistanis without a single shot. Mountbatten was (war room in charge) as supreme commander of both India & Pakistan when the Indian PM was a so-called KP.
Why talk of only KPs? We must think about the following before it is too late.
1. Bhadraloks of Bengal: They did not get warned when Muslim League was formed in 1906. They learned nothing from Banga Vanga (1905-1911). They ran behind Muslims with Rakhi in hand. Lernt nothing from Calcutta Killing, Noyakhali, Partition, or Hindu genocide in the hand of Razakars. 2021 Cumilla Durga Puja, where a Muslim kept Koran on the Idol to instigate Hindu killing, could not move them. But they showed solidarity with Rohingya and BD infiltrators/terrorists and did Ka Ka Ki Ki on the street with Chief Minister.
a. They even refuge to concede that KPs are scholars from many centuries before the Islamic invasion, but these Bengalis became learned only after the British came. This deep root could hold KPS at 2%, but Bhadraloks was 65.5% when the British came and 44% when the British left, and as per my 2021 estimation, they are just around 31% (both Bengal) now. Will they survive till falling to 2%? I have doubts.
b. Bhadroloks are proud of Coffee House, Bhasha Diwas and Mujib’s Jay Bangla. But not the Padma Puran and part of Brahmabaimartya Puran was composed at the bank of River Padma.
2. Sikhs: The warrior people who saved Sanatan Parampara from Muslims had to take Hindu help for survival, but when the British came, they started switching to crypto Christianity through a love crusade with white ladies and now openly supporting anti-nationalism George Soros’s sponsored political dispensation that was formed by Ford Foundation money.
3. Marathas: who formed “Hindu Pad Padshahi” and saved Sanatan Dharma from destruction seeking RESERVATION for survival. Maratha Police, instead of protecting, hand over Hindu Sadhus to terrorists and witness how sadhus are killed. They protect the alleged narcotic gang, D company land jihadi, and Hindu killers.
4. Land of Chola and Pandya etc.: With the inheritance of such a glorious past, they are now willingly slipping into the hand of the “Vatican” by encouraging conversion with reservation and Temple’s money distribution by winning the election with Hindu votes.
5. Some tuber claims that Lalu Prasad and Nitish Kumar have facilitated over 8% fall in Hindu demography by Muslim-Yadav formula and Christian conversion.
6. Media blames, One Catholic and One crypto Chief Minister are encouraging the fall of Hindu demography by encouraging conversion in Andhra and Odisha through employment policy and Hokey Academy.
Are we so ignorant or blind followers who learn nothing?
An Ignorant is only in ignorance until he rediscovers the relevant truth. Truth manifests and therefore needs to be revealed from its proper perspective. Let’s look at the following Hindu events.
1. Samudra Manthan reveals that one who can neutralize the poison (side effect of an act) is only entitled to the AMRIT (nectar). British taught us a democracy where Devas (gods) and Ashuras (demons) are the same. Anyone can rule anyone.
We also interpret SM as winning Good over Evil.
2. Vijayadashami, or Dussehra: is also winning Good over Evil. But we forget that the Evils were destroyed, not ‘lectured’ (given Probachan), and let go.
3. Holi: a win of Good over Evil. Hiloka was ultimately burnt alive to win over, not by persuasion or counselling.
3. Deepavali or Diwali:
Once again, Good wins over Evil. The celebration was of the conquest through war, not signing a treaty with love.
Over the centuries, we should have remembered the significance of ‘Might’ to earn the ‘Right’. Our mighty forefathers failed to take note of the Changes TWO Abrahamic Books brought into the world. They might have been content with their velour and knowledge and felt nothing new to learn. They never needed to read those two books to understand their new challenges or enemies.
I am not a historian, but my curiosity guides me to believe that if they had engaged their RAJGURUS to read and interpret those books from its proper perspective, Hinduism would not have been in this state today.
Conclusion:
1. Ill-treatment of ‘Varnashram Dharma’ might have been a moot cause of the disintegration of Hindu Samaj (society), the onset of which was the emergence of Buddhism and its encounter with Shivites.
2. Purohits (Priests) might have withdrawn from social & intellectual unrest and preferred seclusion, which widened gaps between various Vernas and professionals. Kerala turned into a Lunatic Asylum, and Abrahamic people took advantage.
3. Kashmir became home to Satvic (Hindu and Buddhist intellectuals), and they failed to protect the Varnashram order leading to what it is today.
4. Bengal was a land of Sudras & Vaisya from antiquity. Under Buddhist rule, the Varnasharam system might have wholly vanished, and Sen Dynasty could not recover it before the advent of Islam. British gave the final touch to ruing Hinduism here.
Point to ponder:
I find no new or unique methods that were not used since 711 AD. Did we learn anything?
subhasmitra.co.in 
You must be logged in to post a comment.