Were Indian Muslims ‘weaponised’ to dismantle Hinduism?

Subhas Mitra: 01 August 2025

Prognosis of the Calcutta Killing:

The Times of India published an interview with Prof. Suranjan Das, VC of JU (2015-2023), in which he described the “Calcutta Killing” as a political event, rather than a communal pogrom.

Don’t you think such broad-minded, liberal outlooks must be analysed?

Two important events must be taken into account for further discussion.

Hinduism without spirituality is like an OX without its testicles (Bull Hindu). This was done by William Jones, Max Müller, William Carey, C.F. Andrews, Henry Louis Vivian Derozio, James Long, and others, along with some local ex-Hindus of Calcutta.
To dilute Hindu nationalism and identity (Hindutva), the British formed FOUR political wings: Congress (with non-Hindus and Bull Hindus), Muslim League (with native converts), Justice Party (DMK with Crypto and scripted Atheists) and Communists with anti-Hindu, anti-India rebels.

If Calcutta killing, Noakhali, Chittagong, Rangpur or Murshidabad ethnic cleansing of Hindus and fraudulent conversion are not defined as “Civilizational attack” but “political events” by Hindu intellectuals, the credit goes to European Evangelists of Sr-1 and Hindus affiliated to those FOUR parties.

Without knowing these backgrounds, one would not understand how so many internal adversaries of INDIA entered the Indian parliament to condemn India’s recent progress and ascendance.

Why was the Muslim League needed?

After the Indian Rebellion of 1857, the British took over from the EIC and noted the Kings and Nawabs who supported them and who did not. They developed a clear understanding that maximum Muslim royalties were happy with Hindu subjects and Hindu kings with their Muslim subjects.

This did not augur well for Hindu destruction.

The British facilitated the formation of seven Islamic seminaries (believed to be the brain behind global terrorism) and an exclusive Muslim College (AMU) between 1860 and the 1920s. This was not there in the previous 800 years of Muslim India.

Muslim League formation:

Why was the Muslim League founded in Dhaka and the ‘Direct Action Day’ in Kolkata, rather than in Delhi, Lucknow, Aligarh, Lahore or Karachi?

1. Perhaps the British crown was disappointed seeing Hindus & Muslims joining CONGRESS and taking the party against British rule. (The first president declared that the British would not leave India).

2. Not many Muslim leaders were ready to form a party exclusively for Muslims. But Dhaka Nawab, being a dirty rich man under British patronage, was ready to oblige.

3. Didn’t Bengali Hindus in Calcutta make the city a hotbed for British rulers by revolutionary activities? The capital had to move to Delhi.

4. Direct Action Day was, perhaps, revenge with dual purposes.

5. I do not believe that, without British approval, such “mayhem like Calcutta Killing” could be possible.

6. The Church of England knew how much native Muslims depended on ASHRAF (foreign) Muslims who were theocratic and Sharia compliant. Without involving them, Ajlaf–Arzal ( Native converts) could not be mobilized. Thus, they complied with strict Islamic rituals and beliefs.

Why was Direct Action Day required?

We know “Two Nation Theory” was coined in the British parliament for the issue of both Irelands. Islam does not grant a nation state to Kefir, who can live with AMAN (accepting Islamic protection by paying JIJIYA).

There was a TWO Muslim Theory also:

AIML was a party of ‘British agents and ‘fake Muslims’:

Tahir Mehdi, a Pakistani researcher, wrote this Two-Muslim theory, comparing:

1. Abdul Ghaffar Khan was born in 1890 to rural middle-class Pakhtun parents of Utmanzai, a small town in the present-day district of Charssadda.

2. Nawabzada Liaqat Ali Khan was five years younger than Bacha Khan. He was born in 1895 to a Muslim aristocratic family in UP.

There is a wonderful link that Hindus overlooked:

Sir Syed Ahmad, AK Fazlul Haque, Liyaqat Ali Khan and many Muslims propagated Hindu-Muslim unity, and later two opposed the partition of India but then quietly supported and joined AIML. Why and how? This could be either by British persuasion or due to Nehru’s nepotism in choosing his sister, Vijay Lakshmi Pandit, as USSR ambassador.

1. Even till the early and mid-1940s, the AIML wasn’t quite sure about the support of Muslims.

2. 1937 election AIML did well ONLY in Bengal but in Punjab (57%M), Unionist- 95 seats, Congress- 18 and AIML- 01 one. (in Bengal, 113 out of 230).

3. The Jamiat-i-Ulema-i-Hind (JUH) and the Majlis-i-Ahrar and the Khaksar called AIML a party of ‘British agents,’ and ‘fake Muslims’.

4. In 1944, there was improvement, but AIML could not make a place in the majority of Muslim hearts.

Image: Liaqat Ali

My personal opinion is:

There were THREE Muslim groups in British India:

1. Muslims who knew they could live with Hindus. ( AK Fazul Haque, Liaqat Ali Khan, “Khan of Kalat” (Balochistan) and others)

2. Muslims who did not want partition but slowly converted India as Gazwa-e-Hind ( Maulana Abul Kalam Azad to Hamid Ansari and others)

3. Fake Muslims/ Hindu and British agents. (MK Gandhi, Jinnah and the son of Mubarak Ali – Tussu Rahman Bai with Hindu Hindu-favoured name and many).

(I do not believe Calcutta Killing could have been possible without the consent of the British Crown)

This FAKE MUSLIM Jinnah engineered Hindu genocide CALCUTTA KILLING, Noakhali and Md. Yunus at Chittagong and Rangpur to make a place in the Muslim heart. ( If the USA were behind Md. Yunus, who was behind Jinnah?)

Anyone might join Kefir killing for Hoors and wine after death.

To follow Islamic tenets:

Ghazwa e Hindu:

“Ghazwa-e-Hind’ is found in Sunan an-Nasa’i and Musnad Ahmad, Hadith.

M.K. Gandhi supported the Khilafat by Indian political Muslims in the 1920s.

Ottoman Khalifa died on 10 November 1938.

ARAB WORLD NEITHER ACCEPTED NOR BELIEVED IN BOTH OF THESE, but India was divided to create Pakistan, basically for these issues, as the First instalment.

Muslim League’s Background:

1. Khwaja Alimullah (1772-1854), founder of the Dhaka Nawab Family. His descendant, Nawab Sir Khwaja Salimullah Bahadur, founded AIML- Muslim League in Dhaka on 30 December 1906.

They are largely Nizari Ismaili Shia Muslims, with a smaller Sunni and Ithna’ashari Shia minority. The Khoja community originated from Hindu traders (Baniyas and Lohanas) who converted to Islam in the 14th century.

Nawab’s forefather came from Kashmir as a Gold dust and salt trader and joined hands with the East India Co.

2. Next, the wealthy Muslims were Bhora / Dawoodi Bhora:

The Bohra community’s roots trace back to the early 11th century when missionaries from Egypt, via Yemen, arrived in Gujarat. They, too, are Hindu Business community converts. They are very rich and wealthy; besides, they are the only Muslim community that practices women’s education and empowerment. While Gujarati is widely spoken, they also have a distinct language called Dawat ni Zaban.

3. Ahmedia: founded in 1889 by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, a Mongolian tribe called BARLAS ( similar to non-covert Yezidi, Druze and Kurd) settled in United Punjab. He is regarded as a Paigamber (Prophet), which makes them enemies of mainstream Islam, as “Qadiani.

* Ahmadiyya leader Muhammad Zafarullah Khan drafted the Lahore Resolution, which was a key document in the movement for Pakistan’s creation. How is Ahmadia’s life in Pakistan today?

We all know the British befriended wealthy people and used them to their advantage.

4. Calcutta killer Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy’s father too was a KNIGHTED lawyer of the Persian Shia community.

From 1857 onwards, making Muslims the fresh enemy of Hindus might have been a main target.

5. East India Co (1600AD) was owned by “The Merchant Adventurers”(shareholding co), which received its royal charter from King Henry IV in 1407 AD, but its roots may go back to the Fraternity of St. Thomas of Canterbury (1170 AD- killed by King Henry II).

5. Therefore, EIC belongs to the Church of England, and the Church belongs to the British Crown. The mighty British Empire, in my view, was not an individual’s Kingdom / Empire nor a democratic political force but a participatory merchant force of money making by all possible means ( by force or psychological Intimidation ) of power and strategies ( inculturation, and Conversion).

AIML Aims: (All India Muslim League)

1. To promote among Indian Muslims loyalty to the British Crown.

2.. 4 May 1908, Viceroy refers AIML to the HOUSE OF LORDS IN LONDON.

3. 6th May includes Muslims of UK & Ireland for membership.

4.. 12 May separate Muslim representation – (In London)

5.. 9 Aug 1908 demands a separate High Court for East Bengal and Assam.

6. 1914 Meeting at Jinnah’s chamber in Bombay to meet the viceroy.

(Within TWO years, the aim changed from “British loyalty to separate HC” – ( West Bengal Hindus were signing BEAGALI identity of Muslim and expected their Banga Bhanga participation).

Note: Viceroy deputed Allan Octavian Hume to found CONGRESS and sail through their “Aims “, but AIML was referred directly to the viceroy to the “House of Lords”, London.

How did the Hindus of Bengal save and shape their identity?

1. Some Hindu kings signed a treaty with Muslim invaders after the fall of Lakshman Sen (1203 AD)

2. Some Hindu Kings became Muslim

3.. Some Hindus held Hussain Shah (1494-1519) as Sri Krishna Avatar for which shows softness towards Hinduism.

3a. Some Hindu kings found the Turkish rulers friendlier than the Hinduva Swaraj of Shivaji Maharaj and defamed the Maratha as “Bargee”.

4. Some Hindus even today prefer Md. Yunus – Amartya Sen than Narendra Modi – Draupadi Murmu.

5. Some Hindu leaders sided with the British to foil the freedom movement and Opposed – Anushilan Samiti.

6. Some Hindu leaders joined Muslim rulers to form a separate (from India) BENGAL with a 56% Muslim population.

7. Some Hindu leaders recommended 80% reservation for Muslims and assured formation of a Sharia Compliant Hindus society.

8. Some Hindus made schools, colleges and playgrounds in Muslim areas with their own money in EAST Bengal even after the LAHORE Resolution was signed.

9. Some Hindus in EAST Bengal joined the Muslim League

10. Some Hindus formed the ‘Pakistan National Congress’ to tame Muslims (to straighten the tail).

11. Some Hindus were against the exchange of population that Baba Sahib Ambedkar also recommended.

12. Some Hindus knew what was happening in British Parliament, but never bothered to know what the Muslim League was doing near DHAKESWARI Kali Bari.

13. Some Hindus formed the “Banga Bhanga Andolan” (বঙ্গভঙ্গ আন্দোলন -Partition Movement of Bengal in 1905. They were running behind the Muslims’ cooperation.

14. Some Hindus refused to note the significance of the creation of the Muslim League in 1906.

IMPORTANCE OF THE DATE:

Why 16 August 1946? Direct Action

It was the 18th of Ramadan, 1365 AH.

The 18th day of Ramadan holds significance in Islam as the day the Psalms (Zabur) were revealed to the Prophet David (Dawood).
The Zabur is one of the Holy Scriptures revealed before the Quran.

The Zabur encourages believers to remember God’s miracles, acknowledge His sovereignty, and live righteously.
The Quran 21:105 says that in the Zabur, there is a quote “the land is inherited” (stake claim on the land).

And “We” have already written in the book [of Psalms] after the [previous] mention that the land [of Paradise] is inherited by ‘My’ righteous servants. — Qur’an 21:105[7], Sahih International Translation.

What was started in 711 AD and got stalled in 1757 was revived before the British left in 1947.

Direct Action Day was –A day for Muslims to stake claim on non-Muslim land in India, once again.

Why Freedom of India at Midnight?

15 August 1947 was the 2nd Victory Day of the British, given to India as Independence Day.

Neither the Muslims went to their dreamland nor did the British withdraw their agents from free Indian administration. Only millions of Hindus got killed, displaced, raped and slaughtered with the support of Gandhi-Nehru.

Image: Japan Victory Day

Why is 14th/ 15th August 1947 significant?

1. The Islamic Lunar calendar falls short of 11 days in each year compared to the Solar (Gregorian) calendar.

2. In Islam, a day begins at sunset (Maghrib) and ends at the following sunset.

3. In the Hindu calendar, a day, known as divasa or ahoratra, begins and ends with sunrise.

4. In a Gregorian calendar, a day begins and ends at midnight.

5. 15th August 1947 was a Friday.

It was the BEGINNING OF FRIDAY after 14th August MAGRIB Namaz of JUMMA RATH. (Thursday).

b. For British or Gregorian FRIDAY stated after Midnight (14-15 August)

c. For Hindus, it was Brihaspati bar ( Ratri or Rajani) . SHUKRA Bar starts next SUNRISE.

6 August 14, 1947, the Islamic calendar – 27th of Ramadan, 1366 AH.. Midnight is the beginning of Friday, 27th Ramadan.

7. The 27th night of Ramadan is traditionally regarded as “Laylat al-Qadr”, also known as the Night of Power. The Quran was first revealed to the Prophet Muhammad. (The Quran was given by Allah, and Pakistan was given by the Church of England or the British Crown or their Deep state) . .

8. There is a tradition of special midnight prayers, known as Tahajjud, on the 27th night of Ramadan.. THAT IS PAKISTAN CREATION DAY.

9. There were midnight prayers in some churches (Church of North India) in India on August 15, 1947, coinciding with the moment India achieved independence from British rule. Many churches held special services to mark the occasion, often including prayers for the newly independent nation.

10. MK Gandhi did not attend the function as there was KAFIR KILLING FESTIVAL scheduled in CALCUTTA. To avoid it, he stayed fasting there.

11. Nehru is seen in a photo, flirting with the lady whose husband was performing the FLAG hosting ritual.

12. On August 15th, 1947, the Church of England, London, focused on the traditional Marian feast. Had no special prayer on India’s independence.

13. No Hindu rituals were performed on the Day for which thousands of Hindus laid their lives and suffered in Kalapani.

14. A story was floated about astrological calculation for the occasion. I could not fit them into any of the Islamic schedules. Try to find the significance of astrology.

Thus, Hindus were massacred after 15 August 1947 as per the Book and Hindus were told India had become free.

Conclusion:

Conversion/elimination of Idolaters and polytheists is divinely ordained in both books. Believers have been diligently obeying it ever since the Books were put to application.

Who told Hindus that shifting the Viceroy Office to London and creating Pakistan had halted their expedition for Holy duty?

Ref: